Is E. L. James the new D. H. Lawrence? Fifty Shades of Grey vs Lady Chatterley’s Lover

Pornography is just everywhere these days. (Image Pixabay)

Pornography is just everywhere these days.
(Image Pixabay)

Now, I don’t read erotic fiction and the few ‘snatches’ I have read fall into the slightly cringe worthy category, all full of being swooped up in manly arms and swooning over throbbing anatomies.

Unless you’re physically gorgeous and lit very well, sex is a faintly ridiculous and unattractive spectator sport, whether on screen or on the page. I’d say I’d rather watch Wimbledon, but with the parade of super fit young people exerting themselves and outrageous levels of grunting, there are some close parallels with the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club.

But the erotic is hot right now, thanks to the controversy surrounding a certain, boringly named BDSM trilogy. Which got me  wondering if there were any similarities between this recent sex book scandal and one from the early twentieth century …

Lady Chatterley’s Lover VS Fifty Shades of Grey

The Authors

* D. H. Lawrence hailed from Nottinghamshire, becoming a clerk, then a teacher. Chatterley was his eleventh novel.

* Londoner E. L. James was a T.V executive before turning to writing fan fiction in 2009. The Fifty Shades books were her first published novels and inspired by the Twilight books by Stephenie Meyer.

The theme of dominance and subservience runs through both books.

* Lady Connie Chatterley is socially superior to her gamekeeper  lover Oliver Mellors and she’s the one who does most of the chasing, at least initially, whilst entrepreneur Christian Grey lives a millionaire lifestyle and Ana Steele is a student.

* However, when it comes to the act of lurv, the men are predictably in control. Christian Grey is infamously dominant over Ana. Connie loves the fact that Mellors is a ‘real man’, as opposed to her injured, emasculated husband, Clifford.

* Grey makes Ana sign a nondisclosure agreement, whereas discretion is assumed for Mellors and Connie, given the fact both are married.

As for the ladies …

*Both are young, but whereas Ana is easy to manipulate, naïve and has been untroubled in the downstairs department prior to meeting her millionaire-letch-in-a-box, Connie is a mature, married woman who’s already had an affair with a man from her circle of friends and is actively encouraged by her husband to find someone she can produce a family heir by. Connie and Oliver Mellors have a mutually satisfying relationship which is quite conventional as they hope to marry and raise their child together. By the end of the first Grey book, Ana has learnt how extreme BDSM relationships can be and left Christian Grey – although they reunite in the second book.

So far as venues is concerned …

*Grey goes for sex dungeons, strung with any number of straps, belts, paddles – he’s a bit of a gadget nerd. Connie and Mellors make do with the woods with the occasional visit to a hut – in the woods. So whereas Connie has to look out for spiders or the odd pine cone making its way into an orifice, Ana has a whole armoury of pointy, strappy, holey tools that might end up pretty much anywhere. As I remember, the only foreign object Mellors puts near Connie is some wild flowers plaited in her pubic hair, which is actually rather sweet, if a bit hippyish for a gamekeeper who fought in WWI.

Now, controversy.

Have these two books courted controversy? Mmm, let me think.

*D. H. Lawrence was good at upsetting polite society – in 1915 all copies of The Rainbow were seized and burned, but at least the book was published in the UK. The first edition of Chatterley was produced in Italy, the first unexpurgated edition in the UK wasn’t published until 1960, after the Chatterley Trial.

*The only trial Fifty Shades of Grey has had (for taste, anyway) is trial by media, trial by critic, trial by internet, with huge popularity with the public not being reflected by the literary press. It has been criticised by the BDSM community, who claim it shows ignorance of common safe practices, that the relationship is actually domestic abuse, not sex play.

Both works have generated great quotes.

*The famously out of his depth prosecutor, Mervyn Griffiths Jones said during the Chatterley Trial,

“…when you have read it through, would you approve of your young sons, young daughters – because girls can read as well as boys – reading this book. Is it a book that you would have lying around in your own house? Is it a book that you would even wish your wife or your servants to read?”

This view seems gobsmackingly outdated today, but even in 1960 it came across as appallingly paternalistic and patronising, a sentiment that belonged to the nineteenth century, not the increasingly permissive mid-twentieth century.

*So far as Grey is concerned, there is one quote that summed up how many critics felt about the novel.  Salman Rushdie – not unused to controversy himself, having lived under a fatwa since the publication of The Satanic Verses in 1989 – said,

“I’ve never read anything so badly written that got published. It made Twilight look like War and Peace.”

Although both created hype, controversy, a media storm of bile and invective, from the start Chatterley was little bought (due to the ban) and much championed by critics and fellow writers, whereas Grey has had huge sales figures and been derided by many – though not all – critics.

When written, Lady Chatterley was no doubt ahead of its time, the trial of the book was behind the times.

And Fifty Shades of Grey – intentionally or not – hit the times perfectly, coming out as e-readers were becoming ubiquitous, allowing everyone from primary school teachers to vicars to read controversial works unmolested and unjudged.

Both books could be seen as game changers. Chatterley is still well respected 87 years after its original release. Only time will tell if Fifty Shades will last or be a flash in the pornography pan.


Confession time.

I have read Lady Chatterley – I have NOT read Fifty Shades and most likely never will. Any information on the latter has been gleaned from the nettershphere and if inacurate I apologise – though not that much 🙂 Here are the sources used if you want to do your own sifting – enjoy, you mucky lot!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty_Shades_of_Grey

http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/ladychatterley/section4.rhtml

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._H._Lawrence

http://www.biography.com/people/el-james-21129925#synopsis

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/oct/22/dh-lawrence-lady-chatterley-trial

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/8066784/Lady-Chatterley-trial-50-years-on.-The-filthy-book-that-set-us-free-and-fettered-us-forever.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Chatterley%27s_Lover

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Is E. L. James the new D. H. Lawrence? Fifty Shades of Grey vs Lady Chatterley’s Lover

  1. I’ve not read Fifty Shades, but I have read all of Twilight, unfortunately. I hated Lord of the Flies when I had to read it for school, but in hindsight, I’m glad I’ve read it. I hated Twilight when I read it because it came recommended by a friend whose recommendations were usually great, and I still berate myself for wasting time on it… For that reason alone, I will never, ever read Fifty Shades.

    I suppose I shouldn’t say anything, but this is the Interwebs and ignorance has never stopped anyone from chipping in, so as far as I’m concerned the answer to the question in the title is, no, she’s not. Not even close.

    I love that judge’s quote. I can picture him quite well…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’ve read one Twilight book, the one with the werewolf action in it and that was while I was writing/rewriting my own YA novel – I thought I should see what the fuss was all about. I loathed it – I can’t think of a more self absorbed, whiney heroine or one I’d more like to punch. Which is part of the reason I never want to read Fifty Shades – what a revolting-sounding ‘heroine’ Ana is. I admire the fact you read all the Twilights, though part of me wonders how you managed to stick with them 🙂
      And although I’m not in the habit of slagging off novelists for being immensely popular and not literary geniuses, and despite the fact Grey were her first books and Lawrence was on his eleventh – you’re right, E. L. James will never, ever be Lawrence.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Oh, no, I only read the first Twilight book only. But even that was a chore… I agree, Bella Swann is the most pathetic heroine I’ve come across and it’s exactly why I don’t want to read Fifty Shades. There are too many books to read them all, anyway, so why bother with the bad ones?

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Oh, thank goodness – it disturbed me to think you had such a wide masochistic streak in you!
        Yes, absolutely – too many great books, too little time to waste on nonsense – don’t get me wrong, I appreciate the odd bit of nonsense, but it has to be the right kind 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for an interesting read. I think it is strange that the Twilight books are compared to the 50 shade, I know they were the inspiration but aimed at different audiences, I read the Twilight books as a Teenager and loved them. The people who do not seem to like them are more often than not, not teenage girls. But back to your main point: it will be interesting to see if any one remembers 50 shades in 80 years time.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, I’m afraid I didn’t like Twilight – but I am most definitely NOT a teenage girl 🙂 I didn’t find Bella an attractive personality, but I can see why people would like the on/off romance and vampire elements.
      I suppose the reason people compare Twilight and Fifty Shades is because James originally wrote it as fanfiction and it appeared on Twilight fanfic sites before she was asked to remove it because it was deemed inappropriate for the audience.
      As for Fifty Shades lasting 80 years … I think it will be remembered for being hugely successful, for taking erotic fiction into a wide range of homes via e-readers. I’m not sure it will be on Sparknotes, though 🙂

      Like

    1. Haha! I loved them too! Was looking for a photo to illustrate the post and I’m sure I would’ve had more visitors if I’d used a pick of a semi naked young lady, but … those ladybirds in the act of ‘sweet lurv’ were irresistable.
      Do you reckon it was a home video that got into the wrong hands?

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s